A Big THANKS!
Goes out to members of the NZ White Supremacist community who foolishly supplied us with pictures. You know who you are and we know who you are. Especially Dylan Jenson for warning our agent via Stormfront. It's nice to have members of the NZWS community giving us info...
Cheers Dylan! Your cheque is in the mail but we won't help you to fuck over Reverand Patrick like you asked. Do your own dirty work chum...p! I don't know, don't these guys have any blood between themselves or honour? Oh and thanks once again Dylan for the stuff about Nic and Brendon. A young Dylan J giving us the Goats! Hail Victory bruvva!\M/
posted by xxx, The Gang xxx at 3:35 PM
65 Comments:
ahhh, tove partington up to her old tricks again we see...
That you Niccy Boy?
You would be wrong.
Toves number..
0273045230
Skins and other white nationalists.. Have fun ringing her ;)
Try it. Yell all the abuse you want.
;)
Its 027 304 5230
Don't edit it..
How about you shave your armpit and leg hairs ay Tove you dirty whore. Also don't ring the number as shes edited it.
Ah old boy. She has nothing to do with us but think what you will, it's handy to have a scapegoat when you don't know whose messing with you eh lads?
Hehehehehe
Just came accross your site...
I am from Australia and its great to see that there is a bunch of dedicated honest folk down in NZ who are doing their best to clear the streets of this Nazi trash in their part of the world!!
Keep up the great work!!
Well Thats very kind of you.
Thank You.
Nice stuff. You are truly the fluffiest of bunnies!
Dyls my boyfriend, so about the whole virigity topic, thats alod of bull.
You must be so jealous of me because you seem to be obsessed about Dylan, talking about him, gettting old pics of him, and trying to get youre filthy hands on any bits of information on him and the other boys :)
Sad life bunnies lead.
Brendon? You're going out with Dylan now?!
Good for you lads! Lucky the Civil Union bill just came in. Let me be the first to congratulate the both of you!
Vintersword...you met them but not in person..uh-huh. Astral Travel maybe? Beowulf...Oh I meant you remind me of Grendel!
"The fact was plain when
Beowulf laid that arm
and shoulder down, there
altogether, Grendel's claw,
under the vaulted roof."
I'm Beowulf and you're Grendel.
Anonymous said...
'Dyls my boyfriend, so about the whole virigity topic, thats alod of bull.
You must be so jealous of me because you seem to be obsessed about Dylan, talking about him, gettting old pics of him, and trying to get youre filthy hands on any bits of information on him and the other boys :)
Sad life bunnies lead. '
not as sad as incoherant nazis who live in Woodville.
Wot's a 'virigity'?
Brendon? You're going out with Dylan now?! <--- real mature eh?
Wot's a 'virigity'? <--- It's Ironic isn't it? Look real careful, I will "clap clap" if you can figure it out.
No, you are a worthless hag, you spend your time trying to undercover neo-nazis when they pose no threat what so ever, whilst worshiping silly little maoris. You need a hobby, and sucking nigger cock doesn't count, go listen to some Anti-Flag or something, I know your type and you will get gangraped by some huge polynesians morons someday.
In all honesty, if us supposed "neo-nazis" pose such little threat to you, why is it so important that you combat us? How exactly do we threaten you if we achieve nothing and never will? I'd be very interested to hear who all this info comes from..cowardice should not be rewarded.
Anonymous said...
a load of stuff that is'nt really essential to answer...
Anti-Flag's a bit nu-school for me. I prefer stuff like The Dead Kennedys.
'clap clap'
Nathan said...
In all honesty, if us supposed "neo-nazis" pose such little threat to you, why is it so important that you combat us? How exactly do we threaten you if we achieve nothing and never will? I'd be very interested to hear who all this info comes from..cowardice should not be rewarded.
'NB's' and postering up peoples addresses/pics of their houses does'nt pose a threat?
Our families have a history of fighting Fascists that carries down from the Spainish Civil War to now.You choose to wear the trappings of Nazis don't complain when people get pissed off.
The info comes from your Kamerads files Nathan.Don't feel that just because you post a coherent reply we owe you anything...
No I'm not Brendon.
You should consider taking this blog off. Theres more to Dylan and Brendon than being 'skinheads'.
You should at least have some respect for these guys, people today are too afraid to be even be like them. There are alot far worse people than Dylan so leave him alone, he doesn't need a bunny telling lies about him. If you need to talk about people, do something worthwhile such as rapists for a start.
Just because you know no 'neo-nazi' girls, doesnt mean they dont exist ;)
DIE BUNNIES
Alex, Renee or Sarah...who cares really. All you will ever be is a 'breeder' for unpatriotic New Zealanders who don't have the brains or genetic ability to grow hair.
Respect for neo-nazis that rant about 'muds, kikes etc...' You have to be kidding. Brendons a cowardly young man that hides away in Taupo only coming out when there's enough other 'Soldaten' to cover his ass and Dylan well, someone who poses in front of a Confederate Flag in New Zealand deserves to be taken the piss out of.
Anonymous wrote...
'If you need to talk about people, do something worthwhile such as rapists for a start.'
Such as Nic Miller and those underage girls? Or maybe how certain members of the Nazi community said they were going to kill or gang-rape certain people...or maybe like that bonehead last year that brutally killed that poor Kiwi girl down in Wanganui?
I think it's funny how you people percieve our beliefs, we show allegience to our race and our people, that is our loyalty, not some joke of a multi-cultural pro-gay organisation. The reason as I said early as to why people take photos with themselves in front of Confederate flags etc. is to show their commitment to their cause, though I do find photo taking to be rather quite pointless..
There is only one Race. The Human race. All the rest is just cultures and differant tribes.
Don't confuse us with other organisations Nathan. As they have their way of doing things, we have ours.
Allegiance to their cause? The States who belonged to the Confederacy? Obviously they are topographically and demographically more misguided than we thought they were.
Still repping the RAHOWA?
Nope I'm not. And that is what I meant, people of European heritage. It's not about the states of the confederacy, it is about the cause of the confederacy and what the beliefs are behind it.
I guess it's like people wearing Che Guevara(however that is spelt) shirts etc. I'm pretty sure a majority of those people are not from wherever the fuck in South America he was.
So, Nathan, maybe you could articulate those causes and beliefs in a couple of sentences for anyone interested, then.
Nathan said...Nope I'm not. And that is what I meant, people of European heritage. It's not about the states of the confederacy, it is about the cause of the confederacy and what the beliefs are behind it.
I guess it's like people wearing Che Guevara(however that is spelt) shirts etc. I'm pretty sure a majority of those people are not from wherever the fuck in South America he was.
Slavery? Or the right to define ones own destiny? Now I could say that what gives anyone the right to say how other people live or own them as property. Consider the weakness of the Confederacy was it's slavery economy based on Cotton the Southern States were a Dinosaur out-living their time.
How could the United States really have split into two seperate parts without sooner or later coming to blows?
The North held the Industrial strength so sooner or later the South would've had to 'get with the programme'.
Che Guevarra shirts... no doubt he would be turning in his grave if he could.The same could be said for those 'My Plants are this High' or 'Hitlers 'European Tour /cancelled' shirts...
Alex, Renee or Sarah, nope I'm not one of those stupid whores sorry.
I'm smart enough for you to not know my name:)
Go Dylan!
Do you think by writing shit about him is going to make him be some kind of multi culti race trader??? Uhh, you only make them stronger.
Ah, Valkyrie.
cowgirl_starz@hotmail.com
Stupid email.
Anonymous said...
Go Dylan!
Do you think by writing shit about him is going to make him be some kind of multi culti race trader??? Uhh, you only make them stronger.
If its made them so much stronger, explain to me why they are all running like scared rats....
Race trader? Whats that?
Oh now you got me scared. You may have my email but you dont know anything about me.
Youre only jealous that Dyl is my boyfriend and not yours :)
Oh now you got me scared. You may have my email but you dont know anything about me.
Youre only jealous that Dyl is my boyfriend and not yours :)
Oh yes, Im uber jealous you have the pleasure of Dylans insane ranting.
lol.
Don't sweat it Tovey wovey.
Hows your day going??? Get any good information today??
Brendon...Tut Tut.
You shouldnt threaten people.
Me threaten people tove you are a waste of my time..writing up false details of people...i enjoy the pics scum like you post of me,its a good laugh,there are some details i would like to clear up such as who asked me for a fight? and when did i say no? also when have been to scared to walk around taupo by myself? i do beleive if you came to taupo you would see different.
brendon said...
Me threaten people tove you are a waste of my time..writing up false details of people...i enjoy the pics scum like you post of me,its a good laugh,there are some details i would like to clear up such as who asked me for a fight? and when did i say no? also when have been to scared to walk around taupo by myself? i do beleive if you came to taupo you would see different.
This is not Tove by the way...
The times I've been to Taupo I have'nt seen you 'repping the crooked cross' must be easier to hide in your bedroom in front of the mirror eh Brendon?
How do you answer the phone with your arm permanently up in the air and the other scratching your balls?
I remember you hiding away behind the baldies back in '04'.Must be nice to never have to do anything...What makes you think I owe you anything pertaining to the details written on here?
I forsee a time when i will be in Taupo again. Maybe then we can meet up.
"So, Nathan, maybe you could articulate those causes and beliefs in a couple of sentences for anyone interested, then. "
The belief that European culture should be preserved in all it's forms and kept as pure as possible, to not forget our blood ties with our ancestors, to aknowledge we have our cultures and reject those of which have no relevance to us.
I can't speak on behalf of everyone of course but these are some of the founding reasons as to why I am the way I am.
"Slavery? Or the right to define ones own destiny? Now I could say that what gives anyone the right to say how other people live or own them as property. Consider the weakness of the Confederacy was it's slavery economy based on Cotton the Southern States were a Dinosaur out-living their time."
I think it's mainly due to the principles of racial segregation and purity, I myself don't really have too much interest in the confederacy and since I am not the person being analysed it would be somewhat pointless for me to explain someone elses beliefs and opinions.
i would like all details about me that you have thank you otherwise further actions will be taken
You are in breach of the privacy act!
Rahowa! said...
i would like all details about me that you have thank you otherwise further actions will be taken
You are in breach of the privacy act!
----
Hahahahaha... funny shit!
Mr. Rahowa...(hmmm sounds like a foreign name to me...;p)
Feel free to have your lawyer call ours.
Our lawyers can be reached at
0800 83 83 83
press 1 and they will be right with you.
Mr. Rahowa may be correct.
Squashing ones right to privacy is no laughing manner, especially if in doing so you are breaking the law.
If you are infact collecting and holding information or files on Mr Rahowa or his associates and they request such information, by law you must provide them with such information, and they may, if they wish, make admendments and corrections to any such information.
I suggest the site developers read over the principals which govern the act and make sure all information that has been collected, collated, held, and published, has been done so, legally
Principals that this site may be in breach of are as follows:
Principal 1:
"Purpose of collection of personal information
Personal information shall not be collected by any agency unless-
(a) The information is collected for a lawful purpose connected with a function or activity of the agency; and
(b) The collection of the information is necessary for that purpose."
PRINCIPLE 2:
"Source of personal information
(1) Where an agency collects personal information, the agency shall collect the information directly from the individual concerned.
(2)It is not necessary for an agency to comply with subclause (1) of this principle if the agency believes, on reasonable grounds,-
(a) That the information is publicly available information; or
(b) That the individual concerned authorises collection of the information from someone else; or
(c) That non-compliance would not prejudice the interests of the individual concerned; or
(d) That non-compliance is necessary --
(i) To avoid prejudice to the maintenance of the law by any public sector agency, including the prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution, and punishment of offences; or
(ii) For the enforcement of a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or
(iii) For the protection of the public revenue; or
(iv) For the conduct of proceedings before any court or Tribunal (being proceedings that have been commenced or are reasonably in contemplation); or
(e) That compliance would prejudice the purposes of the collection; or
(f) That compliance is not reasonably practicable in the circumstances of the particular case: or
(g) That the information-
(i) Will not be used in a form in which the individual concerned is identified; or
(ii) Will be used for statistical or research purposes and will not be published in a form that could reasonably be expected to identify the individual concerned; or
(h) That the collection of the information is in accordance with an authority granted under section 54 of this Act."
PRINCIPLE 3:
"Collection of information from subject
(1) Where an agency collects personal information directly from the individual concerned, the agency shall take such steps (if any) as are, in the circumstances, reasonable to ensure that the individual concerned is aware of -
(a) The fact that the information is being collected; and
(b) The purpose for which the information is being collected; and
(c) The intended recipients of the information; and
(d) The name and address of -
(i) The agency that is collecting the information; and
(ii) The agency that will hold the information; and
(e) If the collection of the information is authorised or required by or under law -
(i) The particular law by or under which the collection of the information is so authorised or required; and
(ii) Whether or not the supply of the information by that individual is voluntary or mandatory; and
(f) The consequences (if any) for that individual if all or any part of the requested information is not provided; and
(g) The rights of access to, and correction of, personal information provided by these principles.
(2) The steps referred to in subclause (1) of this principle shall be taken before the information is collected or, if that is not practicable, as soon as practicable after the information is collected.
(3) An agency is not required to take the steps referred to in subclause (1) of this principle in relation to the collection of information from an individual if that agency has taken those steps in relation to the collection, from that individual, of the same information or information of the same kind, on a recent previous occasion.
(4) It is not necessary for an agency to comply with subclause (1) of this principle if the agency believes, on reasonable grounds -
(a) That non-compliance is authorised by the individual concerned; or
(b) That non-compliance would not prejudice the interests of the individual concerned; or
(c) That non-compliance is necessary -
(i) To avoid prejudice to the maintenance of the law by any public sector agency, including the prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution, and punishment -of offences; or
(ii) For the enforcement of a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or
(iii) For the protection of the public revenue; or
(iv) For the conduct of proceedings before any court or Tribunal being proceedings that have been commenced or are reasonably in contemplation); or
(d) That compliance would prejudice the purposes of the collection; or
(e) That compliance is not reasonably practicable in the circumstances of the particular case; or
(f) That the information -
(i) Will not be used in a form in which the individual concerned is identified; or
(ii) Will be used for statistical or research purposes and will not be published in a form that could reasonably be expected to identify the individual concerned."
PRINCIPLE 4:
"Manner of collection of personal information
Personal information shall not be collected by an agency-
(a) By unlawful means; or
(b) By means that, in the circumstances of the case, -
(i) Are unfair; or
(ii) Intrude to an unreasonable extent upon the personal affairs of the individual concerned.
"
PRINCIPLE 6:
"Access to personal information
(1) Where an agency holds personal information in such a way that it can be readily be retrieved, the individual concerned shall be entitled -
(a) To obtain from the agency confirmation of whether or not the agency holds such personal information; and
(b) To have access to that information.
(2) Where, in accordance with subclause (1)(b) of this principle, an individual is given access to personal information, the individual shall be advised that, under principle 7, the individual may request the correction of that information.
(3) The application of this principle is subject to the provisions of Parts IV and V of this Act."
PRINCIPLE 7:
"Correction of personal information
(1) Where an agency holds personal information, the individual concerned shall be entitled
(a) To request correction of the information; and
(b) To request that there be attached to the information a statement of the correction sought but not made.
(2) An agency that holds personal information shall, if so requested by the individual concerned or on its own initiative, take such steps (if any) to correct that information as are, in the circumstances, reasonable to ensure that, having regard to the purposes for which the information may lawfully be used, the information is accurate, up to date, complete, and not misleading.
(3) Where an agency that holds personal information is not willing to correct that information in accordance with a request by the individual concerned, the agency shall, if so requested by the individual concerned, take such steps (if any) as are reasonable in the circumstances to attach to the information, in such a manner that it will always be read with the information, any statement provided by that individual of the correction sought.
(4) Where the agency has taken steps under subclause (2) or subclause (3) of this principle, the agency shall, if reasonably practicable, inform each person or body or agency to whom the personal information has been disclosed of these steps.
(5) Where an agency receives a request made pursuant to subclause (1) of this principle, the agency shall inform the individual concerned of the action taken as a result of the request."
PRINCIPLE 8
"Accuracy, etc., of personal information to be checked before use
An agency that holds information shall not use that information without taking such steps (if any) as are, in the circumstances, reasonable to ensure that, having regard to the purpose for which the information is proposed to be used, the information is accurate, up to date, complete, relevant, and not misleading."
PRINCIPLE 9:
"Agency not to keep personal information for longer than necessary
An agency that holds personal information shall not keep that information for longer than is required for the purposes for which the information may lawfully be used."
PRINCIPLE 10:
"Limits on use of personal information
An agency that holds personal information that was obtained in connection with one purpose shall not use the information for any other purpose unless the agency believes, on reasonable grounds:-
(a) That the source of the information is a publicly available publication; or
(b) That the use of the information for that other purpose is authorised by the individual concerned; or
(c) That non-compliance is necessary -
(i) To avoid prejudice to the maintenance of the law by any public sector agency, including the prevention, detection, investigation, prosecution, and punishment of offences; or
(ii) For the enforcement of a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or
(iii) For the protection of the public revenue; or
(iv) For the conduct of proceedings before any Court or Tribunal (being proceedings that have been commenced or are reasonably in contemplation); or
(d) That the use of the information for that other purpose is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to-
(i) Public health or public safety; or
(ii) The life or health of the individual concerned or another individual; or
(e) That the purpose for which the information is used directly related to the purpose in connection with which the information was obtained; or
(f) That the information-
(i) Is used in a form in which the individual concerned is not identified; or
(ii) Is used for statistical or research purposes and will not be published in a form that could reasonably be expected to identify the individual concerned or;
(g) That the use of the information is in accordance with an authority granted under section 54 of this Act."
PRINCIPLE 11:
"Limits on disclosure of personal information
An agency that holds personal information shall not disclose the information to a person or body or agency unless the agency believes, on reasonable grounds -
(a) That the disclosure of the information is one of the purposes in connection with which the information was obtained or is directly related to the purposes in connection with which the information was obtained; or
(b) That the source of the information is a publicly available publication; or
(c) That the disclosure is to the individual concerned; or
(d) That the disclosure is authorised by the individual concerned; or
(e) That non-compliance is necessary -
(i) To avoid prejudice to the maintenance of the law by any public sector agency, including the prevention, investigation, prosecution, and punishment of offences; or
(ii) For the enforcement of the law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or
(iii) For the protection of the public revenue; or
(iv) For the conduct of proceedings before any court or Tribunal (being proceedings that have been commenced or are reasonably in contemplation); or
(f) That the disclosure of the information is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to-
(i) Public health or public safety; or
(ii) The life or health of the individual concerned or another individual; or
(g) That the disclosure of the information is necessary to facilitate the sale or other disposition of a business as a going concern; or
(h) That the information -
(i) Is to be used in a form in which the individual concerned is not identified; or
(ii) Is to be used for statistical or research purposes and will not be published in a form that could reasonably be expected to identify the individual concerned; or
(i) That the disclosure of the information is in accordance with an authority granted under section 54 of this Act."
Access requests:
You can make a request orally or in writing for access to personal information held by an agency. The agency must make a decision on your request and notify you of it as soon as practicable - and in an any case not later than 20 working days after receiving your request. Agencies may, in certain circumstances, extend the time limit by notice to you.
If the agency does not hold the information you have requested, it must transfer your request to the agency which does hold it, if the identity of the agency is known. If you need help to make your request, agencies have to provide you with reasonable assistance.
Generally agencies have to make information available in the way you would prefer, although there are some exceptions to this.
You can make a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner if:
you have not received a decision about your request (but you need to allow 20 working days);
your request has been declined in full or in part;
you have not been given access in the manner you preferred;
you disagree with a charge which has been imposed by the agency;
the agency has imposed conditions on how you may use, communicate or publish the information you requested;
the agency has extended the time limit for responding to you;
the agency has refused to correct personal information.
Enquiries:
If you believe an agency may have breached the Privacy Act, or if you are not sure of your obligations as an agency, you can call the Privacy Commissioner's enquiries line:
09-302 8655 (for callers in Auckland)
0800 803 909 (for callers in other areas)
Complaints:
You can complain to the Privacy Commissioner about any action which seems to be an interference with your privacy.
In a complaint about access to or correction of personal information, you must have made an access request and had a decision made on it (or a failure to respond within the time limits).
The Commissioner will consider whether the agency had a proper basis for the decision on your request.
In any other complaint, two conditions must be satisfied before an interference with your privacy can be said to have occurred. First, the agency must have breached an information privacy principle or rule from a code of practice. Second, the breach must:
have caused loss, detriment, damage or injury to you;
have adversely affected your rights, benefits, privileges, obligations or interests;
have resulted in significant humiliation, significant loss of dignity, or significant injury to your feelings; or; may do so.
Complaints should be put in writing and can be posted to:
The Privacy Commissioner
P O Box 466
Auckland
Fax 09-302 2305
Complaints can also be emailed to: enquiries@privacy.org.nz
but you should include a postal address and a telephone number. Investigating officers do not normally communicate with parties to complaints by email because of security risks.
You should also include:
a brief description of the action complained about;
relevant dates;
the name and address of the agency complained about (and the names of any people within the agency who have been involved with your complaint);
copies of relevant correspondence.
If in doubt about whether the action can be complained about, you can phone the Commissioner's enquiries line and check with an enquiries officer who may be able to assist by referring you to another agency or suggesting a way of resolving the problem without involving the formal complaints process
Except for access requests in respect of public sector agencies, complaints of breaches of the information privacy principles cannot be heard in the ordinary courts. Complaints can go to the Human Rights Review Tribunal, but only after the Privacy Commissioner has completed or discontinued an investigation into the matter.
If the Commissioner forms the opinion that a complaint has substance (there has been an interference with your privacy), she may refer it to the Director of Human Rights Proceedings, who in turn can issue civil proceedings before the Tribunal. The Privacy Commissioner does not have to refer your complaint to the Director of Human Rights Proceedings. If she does not, or if you are not satisfied with the outcome of your complaint, you may issue proceedings before the Tribunal yourself.
And as we said, ring our Lawyers....
And tell them to bring round a Super Supreme, traditional crust with da woiks!
Oh, and while you're getting al 'Lawyer-re' about things, best you tell that 'privacy act stuff' to ye mate Nic 'Kindy boy' Miller over on his blog eh?
Rahowa! said...
i would like all details about me that you have thank you otherwise further actions will be taken
You are in breach of the privacy act!
3:22 PM
But it's perfectly ok for you fuckwits to go posting my dets all over your WCOTR forum?
Get fucked Dylan. Seriously.
I am interested to know whether the developers of this site own the photographs of 'nazis' on here or not.
You do realise you may be in breach of copyright and privacy laws if you do not have the permission of those photographed or permission from the owners/photographers of the photos, to publish these photos.
Perhaps you might want to copy and paste the privacy issues onto Mr Millers blog. So far it appears no one who believes their privacy has been breached has pointed out to Mr Miller the laws, implications, and his requirements.
I must point out the irony in using Mr Millers blog to justify the creation of your own attention seeking, privacy breaking, blog of shame, and possible illegal actions. If Mr Miller was to commit rape would you use this as a justification and defence if you were to be charged with rape too?
You have been warned that you may be in breach of two NZ laws, it is possible you could also be breaching googles own rules and conditions for blogger. Be aware that if the Privacy Commissioner decides to investigate this matter after complaints, any excuses that you were not aware of the law or principals will be seen as blatant lies, as all has been made available and showen to you.
Public interest...
Public interest doesn't cover the collection of information from individuals by unfair means.
Requests for information held, and for information to be corrected still apply if this site is in 'public interest', unless you want to open yourself up to the risk of possible defamation for having incorrect information?
You do realise you may be in breach of copyright and privacy laws if you do not have the permission of those photographed or permission from the owners/photographers of the photos, to publish these photos.
Then contact your legal representatives and ask them to issue a digital millenium copyright notice on your behalf. Ensure they include the threat of court action if the photos are not removed.
Yeah do that! Hahahahah...the info has been desseminated already.
Funny how the morally superior left get upset and scared when it's their faces printed on a website.
One law for yourselves and another for every one else I guess.
My pic has'nt been shown anywhere yet. The Nazi Intelligence (a misnomer...)capability is inferior and feeble.
You know the reason why?
We don't waste our time trying to find out who is a leftist nutbar. We don't agree with you, but this doesn't mean we are going to harass you or stalk you. We leave those type of tactics and 'fascism' to the left.
The only reason this website has photos and information on people is because they are brave enough to stand up and air their views. Contrary to your own "OMGZ!!@!@ LOOK AT ME I'M AN E-TECTIVE" beliefs and thought patterns no one, especially the public, cares about your 21st Century crusade.
We don't care when you put our photos or information on websites (the obsession with us is a bit creepy and probably not healthy, but you leftists are usually on drugs so you're not thinking long term). We have nothing to hide. You on the other hand go out of your way to be anonymous and think you are brave for doing so. To me it looks as though you are ashamed of your own self and beliefs.
If you think you are really great why not post up information on the big boys. I dare you to get and post up information on the Hammerskins, 4th Reich, Road Knights, and Unit 88.
Show us your balls.
xxx,the gang said................
The Nazi Intelligence capability is inferior and feeble.That as it may seem to U ferals.Now lets see whats come in today ah yes.The latest pic of tovey wovey plus 2 more ferals now have names and files.
show us your balls
No thanks Molly, did'nt ya get enough of that in the big house?
That as it may seem to U ferals.Now lets see whats come in today ah yes.The latest pic of tovey wovey plus 2 more ferals now have names and files.
Yawnnnnnn....I think the saying is 'pics or it did'nt happen'.
We don't waste our time trying to find out who is a leftist nutbar. We don't agree with you, but this doesn't mean we are going to harass you or stalk you. We leave those type of tactics and 'fascism' to the left.
Have you seen that Redwatch NZ website? I suppose while it doesn't directly say 'harass these people,' it certainly implies to do so.
Have you considered the possibility that you might be more effective speaking for yourself, instead of on behalf of the WN community (if you could call it that).
joe f has links to dylan and brendon. all of them faggs
Yes Bat, I have seen Redwatch NZ.
Redwatch NZ is a direct response to similar leftist websites which keep lists and information on people who hold a different set of ideas and values. FDB and similar sites have been publishing and acquiring information on peoples private lives for nearly 2 years now. If their views are right and they upstanding citizens, what do they have to hide? Why are they ashamed and scared when their photos pop up?
A question for you bat. Who came first the fash or the anti-fash?
Apart from the post on Kyle Chapman, all the targets on here are young adolescent males, yet the creators are allegedly much older than their opposites. The author(s) on here have only targeted the smaller and easier groups of the WN movement. These targets are made out to be stupid, inferior, and easily led astray. Because of this one can only conclude the author gains a sense of power, control, and purpose, of which offline in the real world, she has none. FDB is run in the same "thou is morally inferior to thee" attitude.
Perhaps, due to some sick psychological phenomena or unusual fetish brought on by hibitual drug use, the author obtains sexual gratification from stalking, luring, and then striking her prey of young men. Why else would she go to such great lengths and spend so much time on group of 'incoherent trash'.
Celtic Cross,
Yes Bat, I have seen Redwatch NZ.
Redwatch NZ is a direct response to similar leftist websites which keep lists and information on people who hold a different set of ideas and values. FDB and similar sites have been publishing and acquiring information on peoples private lives for nearly 2 years now. If their views are right and they upstanding citizens, what do they have to hide? Why are they ashamed and scared when their photos pop up?
I don't know whether any of them are ashamed, that's a question best asked to someone featured. I could understand that they might be scared, considering the nature of the website and it's intended audience.
A question for you bat. Who came first the fash or the anti-fash?
In regards to 'name and shame' -type websites, to my knowledge FDB was first. However what distinctly differentiates one from the other is the fact that FDB will just give a name, whereas Redwatch NZ will give an address where you can find a name; That's ties into the fear I mentioned in the previous paragraph.
Apart from the post on Kyle Chapman, all the targets on here are young adolescent males, yet the creators are allegedly much older than their opposites. The author(s) on here have only targeted the smaller and easier groups of the WN movement. These targets are made out to be stupid, inferior, and easily led astray. Because of this one can only conclude the author gains a sense of power, control, and purpose, of which offline in the real world, she has none. FDB is run in the same "thou is morally inferior to thee" attitude.
In a way yes, I guess it could be interpreted that way; but I suppose the answer lies more in the genuineness of the authors/s' intention. It could be an attempt to gain a sense of power/control but it could just as easily and be an attempt to stop Nazis and Fascists. Ultimately you're free to interpret it however which way you want...
Perhaps, due to some sick psychological phenomena or unusual fetish brought on by hibitual drug use, the author obtains sexual gratification from stalking, luring, and then striking her prey of young men. Why else would she go to such great lengths and spend so much time on group of 'incoherent trash'.
To respond seriously: I doubt it. The author/s probably perceives the people featured to be more ignorant, the type that fail to understand the gravity attached to their voicing their socially unaccepted opinions.
FDB has only been around just over 1 year.
Privacy act doesn't apply to individuals unfortunatly mr cross.
You could chase after google, good luck, or try to put together a very expensive defamation case.
But proving the extent to which you have been defamed (if you have infact been defamed) is impossible.
Now no lawyer will take you lot on pro bono, so I hope you've been saving up your doll payments.
Did you see how long it took to get leftywatch taken down?? And we've got backing from ZOG!!!
And has had been said before..it is GRUPPE Fluffy Bunny...
Which implies a Group of Fluffy Bunnies rather than just one person.
Ah, kamerad, looks like these folks don't know enough German between them to translate "gruppe"; nor enough technological savvy to find a machine translation web site.
I was accused of being this Tove person before when I'd had nothing but Internet and telephone contact with her. Not that the modern-day NSDAP wannabe types have enough braincells to rub together even on the best day..
Why is this site by itself and the information not on FDB?
Really simple: we are not FDB. They do their work and we do ours. When they like our work, they re-publish it. We have different guiding philosophies and use different tactics to get results. There's room for both in the anti-fascist movement.
You may as well ask why the news is both on CNN and BBC.
I'm impressed with your site, very nice graphics!
»
Post a Comment
<< Home